Home
Contact Us
Area Designations
Air Quality
AQ Plans
Air Toxics
Ask Eric Wality
Board
Burn Info
Calendar
CEQA Planning
Employment
Grant Programs
Hearing Board Kid's Zone
Permit
Rules 'n Regs
SB 700
Teachers
Yuba-Sutter Transit

 

           
           

2003 AIR QUALITY ATTAINMENT PLAN
CHAPTER II - AIR MONITORING

II.1      INTRODUCTION

This chapter of the California Clean Air Act Attainment Plan Update will look at NSVAB air quality monitoring data and results from the past three years (2000-2002).

This 2003 Plan Update is primarily concerned with the pollutant ozone for which the NSVAB has been designated nonattainment. This plan update will also examine the pollutant PM10.

The air quality data contained in Appendix B was provided by the CARB website at www.arb.ca.gov/adam/welcome.html. This section contains air quality statistics for the NSVAB.  Statistics are reported in units of concentration.

The Ambient Air Quality Standards establish the concentration at which the pollutant is known to cause adverse health effects to sensitive groups within the population, such as children and the elderly. Both the California and federal governments have adopted health-based standards for the criteria pollutants, which include ozone, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and carbon monoxide. In general, the air quality standards are expressed as a measure of the amount of pollutant per unit volume of air.  For example, the particulate matter standard is expressed as micrograms of particulate matter per cubic meter of air (ug/m3) and the ozone standard is expressed as parts per million (ppm).

II.2      OZONE MONITORING

Ozone is a colorless gas with a pungent odor. It is the chief component of urban smog. Ozone is not directly emitted as a pollutant, but is formed in the atmosphere when precursor emissions, hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides, react in the presence of sunlight. Generally, low wind speeds or stagnant air coupled with warm temperatures and cloudless skies provide for the optimum conditions. As a result, summer is generally the peak ozone season. Because of the reaction time involved, peak ozone concentrations often occur far downwind of the precursor emissions. Therefore, ozone is a regional pollutant that often impacts a widespread area. In addition to adverse health effects, ozone causes damage to open vegetation, building surfaces, exposed rubber surfaces, and certain exposed plastics.

Meteorology (weather) and topography (the lay of the land) play major roles in ozone formation. When the weather is warm and the winds are light, a vertical downward motion of air and a natural cooling of the earth’s surface act together to form an inversion that traps pollutants. Sunlight then causes a chemical reaction between the hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides to form ozone.

The Sacramento Valley is shaped like an elongated bowl. Temperature inversion layers can clamp a lid on the bowl, allowing air pollution to rise to unhealthy levels. Weather conditions cause air pollution concentrations to fluctuate widely from day to day and season to season.

Topography alone gives the NSVAB great potential for trapping and accumulating air pollutants. The strong inversions typical of NSVAB summers are caused by subsidence, the slow sinking of air causing compressional warming. The surface inversions typical of winter are formed primarily at night as air is cooled when it comes in contact with the earth’s cold surface. These are called radiation inversions.

Temperature inversions prevent pollutants from rising and being diluted vertically. Thus, pollutants remain trapped in the layer of air where people breathe. Summer subsidence inversions occur on over 90% of summer days; they persist throughout the day and tend to intensify during the afternoon. Winter radiation inversions occur on over 70% of winter nights, but are usually destroyed by daytime heating, bringing a rapid improvement in air quality by afternoon. Both types of inversion mechanisms may operate at any time of the year, and in the fall both may occur together to produce the heaviest pollution potential.

Recognizing the adverse health impacts of daylong exposure, the United States Environmental Protection Agency promulgated an 8-hour ozone standard in 1997 as a successor to the 1-hour standard, which was established in 1979.

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR OZONE

State Ozone Standard:

0.09 ppm for 1 hour --

not to be exceeded

National Ozone Standards:

0.12 ppm for 1 hour -- not to be exceeded more than once per year

0.08 ppm for 8 hours -- not to be exceeded based on the fourth highest concentration averaged over 3 years.

Litigation delayed the implementation of the national 8-hour ozone standard proposed in 1997. EPA issued a proposed rule in May 2003. The proposed rule does not identify, or designate, areas that do not meet the new standard. Designations for attainment and nonattainment areas will occur by April 15, 2004, under a separate process. 

Ozone Summary

Figure 2 shows the placement of the air monitoring stations operating from 2000 through 2002 in the NSVAB.  The placement of the ozone monitors appears evenly distributed throughout the NSVAB. Currently there are eleven ozone monitors operating in the NSVAB.  Shasta County has three monitors, one located in Redding, one in Anderson and one in Lassen Volcanic Park; Butte County has two monitors, one located in Chico and one located in Paradise; Sutter County has three monitors, located in Yuba City, Pleasant Grove (removed prior to January 2003) and one on the Sutter Buttes; Tehama County has two monitors, one in downtown Red Bluff and one on the Tuscan Buttes; Glenn County has one monitor in Willows; and Colusa County has one monitor in the town of Colusa. 

Appendix A, Ozone Tables and Graphs depict, by county, 3-year ozone air quality data including: maximum 1-hour and 8-hour concentrations; days above State standard; days above national 1-hour and 8-hour standard.

The State standard allows only one exceedance per year on average at any site within the Air District in the preceding three-year period. This is meant to take into account year-to-year weather fluctuation and any exceptional exceedances. The California Air Resources Board has established three categories of exceptional exceedances: (1) “exceptional events” (i.e. forest fires); (2) “extreme concentration events”; and (3) “unusual concentration events”.

Ozone trends are variable and unique for each district within the NSVAB. During the past three-year period, the Butte County Paradise monitor, and the Tehama County Red Bluff monitor experienced the highest number of ozone violations in the basin. Ozone concentrations in the NSVAB have remained relatively constant over the past three years while population and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) have increased during the same period. Shasta County ozone violations significantly decreased in the past three years. The decreases in ozone concentrations are largely due to favorable meteorological conditions during this time period.

As explained in Chapter IV - Transport of Pollutants, ozone violations in the NSVAB have been classified as transport from the Broader Sacramento Area. The California Air Resources Board (ARB) has defined the impacts of transported air pollution from the Broader Sacramento Area to air districts in the Northern Sacramento Valley (also known as Upper Sacramento Valley). The ARB’s most recent assessment, published in March 2001, is discussed further in Chapter IV. 

II.3      PM10 MONITORING

Particulate Matter (PM10) refers to particles with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 microns or smaller. For comparison, the diameter of a human hair is about 50 to 100 microns. PM10 is a mixture of substances that includes: elements such as carbon, lead, and nickel; compounds such as nitrates, organic compounds, and sulfates; and complex mixtures such as soil and diesel exhaust. These substances occur in the form of solid particles or as liquid droplets. Primary particles are emitted directly into the atmosphere. Secondary particles result from gases that are transformed into particles through physical and chemical processes in the atmosphere.

PM2.5 includes a subgroup of particles that are less than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter. Fine particulate matter poses an increased health risk because it can be deposited deep into the lung and may contain substances that are particularly harmful to human health. The EPA promulgated two new national PM2.5 standards in 1997. EPA plans to make final designations by December 15, 2004 based on data from 2001-2003, to reflect the most recent three years of data.

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR PARTICULATE MATTER

State PM10 Standards:

50 ug/m3 for 24 hours;

20 ug/m3 for annual geometric mean

Neither to be exceeded

State PM2.5 Standards:

12 ug/m3 for annual arithmetic mean

National PM10 Standards:

150 ug/m3 for 24 hours

not to be exceeded more than once per year;

 

National PM2.5 Standards:

65 ug/m3 for 24 hours -- not to be exceeded based on the 98th percentile concentration averaged over three years;

15 ug/m3 annual arithmetic mean averaged over three years.

PM10 Summary

Appendix B, Particulate Matter Tables and Graphs depict, by county, three-year PM10 air quality statistics including: Maximum 24-hour Concentration; Maximum Annual Geometric and Arithmetic Mean; Estimated Days Above State 24-hour Standard; and Days Above National 24-hour Standard.

PM10 trends are also unique and variable for each district within the NSVAB. In comparison to ozone, PM10 concentrations do not relate well to growth in population or increased vehicle usage. High PM10 concentrations do not always occur in high population areas. Again, weather and topography play an important role in the fluctuation of air pollution concentrations from day to day and season to season.

In the past three years the Yuba City, Glenn and Chico monitoring stations had the highest number of estimated days above the State PM10 standard. Yuba City and Red Bluff had the highest annual averages. The NSVAB has had only one national 24-hour PM10 standard exceedance since 1987. This national exceedance occurred in Colusa County in 1999 and was significantly influenced by wildfires in the area. Because many of the sources that contribute to ozone also contribute to PM10, future ozone emission controls may improve PM10 air quality.

II.4      Emission Inventory

The California Air Pollution Control and Air Quality Management Districts and the California Air Resources Board (ARB) develop the emission inventory and associated emissions projections jointly. The California Emission Forecasting System (CEFS) is the computer tool used to develop the projections; the emission estimates are based on the most currently available growth and control data. For mobile sources, CEFS integrates the emission estimates from the EMFAC model. The emission projections are based on the 1999 inventory with updates as of November 2002.

In the following tables are forecast emissions for the Sacramento Valley Air Basin for Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) for several source categories. The annual average emissions are reported in tons per day for the years 2010, 2015 and 2020. The projected emissions show a downtrend for both ROG and NOx, which are the precursor emissions for ozone.

REACTIVE ORGANIC GASES PROJECTED EMISSION INVENTORY
SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN

REPORT TYPE:    

GROWN AND CONTROLLED

SEASON:    

ANNUAL AVERAGE

BASE YEAR:    

1999

 
All emissions are represented in Tons per Day and reflect the most current data provided to ARB.

STATIONARY SOURCES

SUMMARY CATEGORY NAME

2010

2015

2020

FUEL COMBUSTION

 

 

 

ELECTRIC UTILITIES

0.283

0.587

0.588

COGENERATION

0.180

1.500

1.500

OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION (COMBUSTION)

0.435

0.435

0.435

MANUFACTURING AND INDUSTRIAL

0.422

0.454

0.478

FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL PROCESSING

0.728

0.793

0.854

SERVICE AND COMMERCIAL

0.709

0.730

0.734

OTHER (FUEL COMBUSTION)

0.293

0.224

0.171

* TOTAL FUEL COMBUSTION

3.050

4.723

4.761

WASTE DISPOSAL

 

 

 

SEWAGE TREATMENT

0.037

0.040

0.044

LANDFILLS

0.426

0.467

0.503

INCINERATORS

0.007

0.007

0.007

SOIL REMEDIATION

0.038

0.042

0.044

OTHER (WASTE DISPOSAL)

0.001

0.001

0.001

* TOTAL WASTE DISPOSAL

0.509

0.557

0.600

CLEANING AND SURFACE COATINGS

 

 

 

LAUNDERING

0.075

0.081

0.087

DEGREASING

3.084

3.220

3.338

COATINGS AND RELATED PROCESS SOLVENTS

14.582

16.495

18.179

PRINTING

1.075

1.181

1.284

ADHESIVES AND SEALANTS

0.963

0.932

0.911

OTHER (CLEANING AND SURFACE COATINGS)

0.129

0.141

0.152

* TOTAL CLEANING AND SURFACE COATINGS

19.909

22.051

23.951

PETROLEUM PRODUCTION AND MARKETING

 

 

 

OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION

11.731

13.375

15.056

PETROLEUM REFINING

0.081

0.081

0.081

PETROLEUM MARKETING

6.145

6.600

7.155

OTHER (PETROLEUM PRODUCTION AND MARKETING)

0.010

0.011

0.012

* TOTAL PETROLEUM PRODUCTION AND MARKETING

17.967

20.067

22.304

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

 

 

 

CHEMICAL

3.671

4.083

4.444

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE

1.046

1.131

1.205

MINERAL PROCESSES

1.338

1.463

1.561

METAL PROCESSES

0.000

0.000

0.000

WOOD AND PAPER

1.573

1.745

1.903

GLASS AND RELATED PRODUCTS

0.000

0.000

0.000

ELECTRONICS

0.038

0.045

0.051

OTHER (INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES)

0.575

0.657

0.728

* TOTAL INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

8.240

9.124

9.892

** TOTAL STATIONARY SOURCES

49.675

56.522

61.507

AREA-WIDE SOURCES

SUMMARY CATEGORY NAME

2010

2015

2020

SOLVENT EVAPORATION

 

 

 

CONSUMER PRODUCTS

18.517

19.850

21.323

ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS AND RELATED PROCESS SOLVENTS

8.304

8.662

9.097

PESTICIDES/FERTILIZERS

6.241

6.830

7.383

ASPHALT PAVING / ROOFING

6.818

6.877

6.913

* TOTAL SOLVENT EVAPORATION

39.880

42.218

44.715

MISCELLANEOUS PROCESSES

 

 

 

RESIDENTIAL FUEL COMBUSTION

9.552

9.718

9.997

FARMING OPERATIONS

2.107

2.107

2.107

CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION

0.000

0.000

0.000

PAVED ROAD DUST

0.000

0.000

0.000

UNPAVED ROAD DUST

0.000

0.000

0.000

FUGITIVE WINDBLOWN DUST

0.000

0.000

0.000

FIRES

0.058

0.060

0.064

WASTE BURNING AND DISPOSAL

14.333

14.328

14.317

COOKING

0.201

0.216

0.231

* TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS PROCESSES

26.251

26.430

26.715

** TOTAL AREA-WIDE SOURCES

66.132

68.647

71.431

MOBILE SOURCES

SUMMARY CATEGORY NAME

2010

2015

2020

ON-ROAD MOTOR VEHICLES

 

 

 

LIGHT DUTY PASSENGER (LDA)

15.292

9.992

7.295

LIGHT DUTY TRUCKS - 1 (LDT1)

9.660

7.047

5.294

LIGHT DUTY TRUCKS - 2 (LDT2)

7.090

5.491

4.444

MEDIUM DUTY TRUCKS (MDV)

3.543

2.867

2.342

LIGHT HEAVY DUTY GAS TRUCKS - 1 (LHDV1)

0.783

0.713

0.777

LIGHT HEAVY DUTY GAS TRUCKS - 2 (LHDV2)

0.282

0.239

0.199

MEDIUM HEAVY DUTY GAS TRUCKS (MHDV)

1.972

1.301

0.855

HEAVY HEAVY DUTY GAS TRUCKS (HHDV)

1.375

0.892

0.553

LIGHT HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRUCKS - 1 (LHDV1)

0.086

0.063

0.049

LIGHT HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRUCKS - 2 (LHDV2)

0.058

0.043

0.032

MEDIUM HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRUCKS (MHDV)

0.286

0.227

0.183

HEAVY HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRUCKS (HHDV)

1.389

1.006

0.776

MOTORCYCLES (MCY)

1.211

1.012

0.969

HEAVY DUTY DIESEL URBAN BUSES (UB)

0.099

0.092

0.087

HEAVY DUTY GAS URBAN BUSES (UB)

0.310

0.296

0.267

SCHOOL BUSES (SB)

0.149

0.150

0.145

MOTOR HOMES (MH)

0.438

0.291

0.164