|
Home |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR OZONE |
|
|
State Ozone Standard: 0.09 ppm for 1 hour -- not to be exceeded |
National Ozone Standards: 0.12 ppm for 1 hour -- not to be exceeded more than once per year 0.08 ppm for 8 hours -- not to be exceeded based on the fourth highest concentration averaged over 3 years. |
Litigation delayed the implementation of the national 8-hour ozone standard proposed in 1997. EPA issued a proposed rule in May 2003. The proposed rule does not identify, or designate, areas that do not meet the new standard. Designations for attainment and nonattainment areas will occur by April 15, 2004, under a separate process.
Figure 2 shows the placement of the air monitoring stations operating from 2000 through 2002 in the NSVAB. The placement of the ozone monitors appears evenly distributed throughout the NSVAB. Currently there are eleven ozone monitors operating in the NSVAB. Shasta County has three monitors, one located in Redding, one in Anderson and one in Lassen Volcanic Park; Butte County has two monitors, one located in Chico and one located in Paradise; Sutter County has three monitors, located in Yuba City, Pleasant Grove (removed prior to January 2003) and one on the Sutter Buttes; Tehama County has two monitors, one in downtown Red Bluff and one on the Tuscan Buttes; Glenn County has one monitor in Willows; and Colusa County has one monitor in the town of Colusa.
Appendix A, Ozone Tables and Graphs depict, by county, 3-year ozone air quality data including: maximum 1-hour and 8-hour concentrations; days above State standard; days above national 1-hour and 8-hour standard.
The State standard allows only one exceedance per year on average at any site within the Air District in the preceding three-year period. This is meant to take into account year-to-year weather fluctuation and any exceptional exceedances. The California Air Resources Board has established three categories of exceptional exceedances: (1) “exceptional events” (i.e. forest fires); (2) “extreme concentration events”; and (3) “unusual concentration events”.
Ozone trends are variable and unique for each district within the NSVAB. During the past three-year period, the Butte County Paradise monitor, and the Tehama County Red Bluff monitor experienced the highest number of ozone violations in the basin. Ozone concentrations in the NSVAB have remained relatively constant over the past three years while population and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) have increased during the same period. Shasta County ozone violations significantly decreased in the past three years. The decreases in ozone concentrations are largely due to favorable meteorological conditions during this time period.
As explained in Chapter IV - Transport of Pollutants, ozone violations in the NSVAB have been classified as transport from the Broader Sacramento Area. The California Air Resources Board (ARB) has defined the impacts of transported air pollution from the Broader Sacramento Area to air districts in the Northern Sacramento Valley (also known as Upper Sacramento Valley). The ARB’s most recent assessment, published in March 2001, is discussed further in Chapter IV.
Particulate Matter (PM10) refers to particles with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 microns or smaller. For comparison, the diameter of a human hair is about 50 to 100 microns. PM10 is a mixture of substances that includes: elements such as carbon, lead, and nickel; compounds such as nitrates, organic compounds, and sulfates; and complex mixtures such as soil and diesel exhaust. These substances occur in the form of solid particles or as liquid droplets. Primary particles are emitted directly into the atmosphere. Secondary particles result from gases that are transformed into particles through physical and chemical processes in the atmosphere.
PM2.5 includes a subgroup of particles that are less than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter. Fine particulate matter poses an increased health risk because it can be deposited deep into the lung and may contain substances that are particularly harmful to human health. The EPA promulgated two new national PM2.5 standards in 1997. EPA plans to make final designations by December 15, 2004 based on data from 2001-2003, to reflect the most recent three years of data.
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR PARTICULATE MATTER |
||
|
State PM10 Standards: 50 ug/m3 for 24 hours; 20 ug/m3 for annual geometric mean Neither to be exceeded State PM2.5 Standards: 12 ug/m3 for annual arithmetic mean |
National PM10 Standards: 150 ug/m3 for 24 hours not to be exceeded more than once per year;
|
National PM2.5 Standards: 65 ug/m3 for 24 hours -- not to be exceeded based on the 98th percentile concentration averaged over three years; 15 ug/m3 annual arithmetic mean averaged over three years. |
Appendix B, Particulate Matter Tables and Graphs depict, by county, three-year PM10 air quality statistics including: Maximum 24-hour Concentration; Maximum Annual Geometric and Arithmetic Mean; Estimated Days Above State 24-hour Standard; and Days Above National 24-hour Standard.
PM10 trends are also unique and variable for each district within the NSVAB. In comparison to ozone, PM10 concentrations do not relate well to growth in population or increased vehicle usage. High PM10 concentrations do not always occur in high population areas. Again, weather and topography play an important role in the fluctuation of air pollution concentrations from day to day and season to season.
In the past three years the Yuba City, Glenn and Chico monitoring stations had the highest number of estimated days above the State PM10 standard. Yuba City and Red Bluff had the highest annual averages. The NSVAB has had only one national 24-hour PM10 standard exceedance since 1987. This national exceedance occurred in Colusa County in 1999 and was significantly influenced by wildfires in the area. Because many of the sources that contribute to ozone also contribute to PM10, future ozone emission controls may improve PM10 air quality.
The California Air Pollution Control and Air Quality Management Districts and the California Air Resources Board (ARB) develop the emission inventory and associated emissions projections jointly. The California Emission Forecasting System (CEFS) is the computer tool used to develop the projections; the emission estimates are based on the most currently available growth and control data. For mobile sources, CEFS integrates the emission estimates from the EMFAC model. The emission projections are based on the 1999 inventory with updates as of November 2002.
In the following tables are forecast emissions for the Sacramento Valley Air Basin for Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) for several source categories. The annual average emissions are reported in tons per day for the years 2010, 2015 and 2020. The projected emissions show a downtrend for both ROG and NOx, which are the precursor emissions for ozone.
|
REPORT TYPE: |
GROWN AND CONTROLLED |
|
ANNUAL AVERAGE |
|
|
1999 |
All emissions are represented in Tons per Day and reflect the most current data
provided to ARB.
|
STATIONARY SOURCES |
|||
|
SUMMARY CATEGORY NAME |
2010 |
2015 |
2020 |
|
FUEL COMBUSTION |
|
|
|
|
ELECTRIC UTILITIES |
0.283 |
0.587 |
0.588 |
|
COGENERATION |
0.180 |
1.500 |
1.500 |
|
OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION (COMBUSTION) |
0.435 |
0.435 |
0.435 |
|
MANUFACTURING AND INDUSTRIAL |
0.422 |
0.454 |
0.478 |
|
FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL PROCESSING |
0.728 |
0.793 |
0.854 |
|
SERVICE AND COMMERCIAL |
0.709 |
0.730 |
0.734 |
|
OTHER (FUEL COMBUSTION) |
0.293 |
0.224 |
0.171 |
|
* TOTAL FUEL COMBUSTION |
3.050 |
4.723 |
4.761 |
|
WASTE DISPOSAL |
|
|
|
|
SEWAGE TREATMENT |
0.037 |
0.040 |
0.044 |
|
LANDFILLS |
0.426 |
0.467 |
0.503 |
|
INCINERATORS |
0.007 |
0.007 |
0.007 |
|
SOIL REMEDIATION |
0.038 |
0.042 |
0.044 |
|
OTHER (WASTE DISPOSAL) |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
|
* TOTAL WASTE DISPOSAL |
0.509 |
0.557 |
0.600 |
|
CLEANING AND SURFACE COATINGS |
|
|
|
|
LAUNDERING |
0.075 |
0.081 |
0.087 |
|
DEGREASING |
3.084 |
3.220 |
3.338 |
|
COATINGS AND RELATED PROCESS SOLVENTS |
14.582 |
16.495 |
18.179 |
|
PRINTING |
1.075 |
1.181 |
1.284 |
|
ADHESIVES AND SEALANTS |
0.963 |
0.932 |
0.911 |
|
OTHER (CLEANING AND SURFACE COATINGS) |
0.129 |
0.141 |
0.152 |
|
* TOTAL CLEANING AND SURFACE COATINGS |
19.909 |
22.051 |
23.951 |
|
PETROLEUM PRODUCTION AND MARKETING |
|
|
|
|
OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION |
11.731 |
13.375 |
15.056 |
|
PETROLEUM REFINING |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.081 |
|
PETROLEUM MARKETING |
6.145 |
6.600 |
7.155 |
|
OTHER (PETROLEUM PRODUCTION AND MARKETING) |
0.010 |
0.011 |
0.012 |
|
* TOTAL PETROLEUM PRODUCTION AND MARKETING |
17.967 |
20.067 |
22.304 |
|
INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES |
|
|
|
|
CHEMICAL |
3.671 |
4.083 |
4.444 |
|
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE |
1.046 |
1.131 |
1.205 |
|
MINERAL PROCESSES |
1.338 |
1.463 |
1.561 |
|
METAL PROCESSES |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
WOOD AND PAPER |
1.573 |
1.745 |
1.903 |
|
GLASS AND RELATED PRODUCTS |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
ELECTRONICS |
0.038 |
0.045 |
0.051 |
|
OTHER (INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES) |
0.575 |
0.657 |
0.728 |
|
* TOTAL INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES |
8.240 |
9.124 |
9.892 |
|
** TOTAL STATIONARY SOURCES |
49.675 |
56.522 |
61.507 |
|
AREA-WIDE SOURCES |
|||
|
SUMMARY CATEGORY NAME |
2010 |
2015 |
2020 |
| SOLVENT EVAPORATION |
|
|
|
| CONSUMER PRODUCTS |
18.517 |
19.850 |
21.323 |
| ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS AND RELATED PROCESS SOLVENTS |
8.304 |
8.662 |
9.097 |
| PESTICIDES/FERTILIZERS |
6.241 |
6.830 |
7.383 |
| ASPHALT PAVING / ROOFING |
6.818 |
6.877 |
6.913 |
| * TOTAL SOLVENT EVAPORATION |
39.880 |
42.218 |
44.715 |
| MISCELLANEOUS PROCESSES |
|
|
|
| RESIDENTIAL FUEL COMBUSTION |
9.552 |
9.718 |
9.997 |
| FARMING OPERATIONS |
2.107 |
2.107 |
2.107 |
| CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
| PAVED ROAD DUST |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
| UNPAVED ROAD DUST |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
| FUGITIVE WINDBLOWN DUST |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
| FIRES |
0.058 |
0.060 |
0.064 |
| WASTE BURNING AND DISPOSAL |
14.333 |
14.328 |
14.317 |
| COOKING |
0.201 |
0.216 |
0.231 |
| * TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS PROCESSES |
26.251 |
26.430 |
26.715 |
| ** TOTAL AREA-WIDE SOURCES |
66.132 |
68.647 |
71.431 |
|
MOBILE SOURCES |
|||
|
SUMMARY CATEGORY NAME |
2010 |
2015 |
2020 |
| ON-ROAD MOTOR VEHICLES |
|
|
|
| LIGHT DUTY PASSENGER (LDA) |
15.292 |
9.992 |
7.295 |
| LIGHT DUTY TRUCKS - 1 (LDT1) |
9.660 |
7.047 |
5.294 |
| LIGHT DUTY TRUCKS - 2 (LDT2) |
7.090 |
5.491 |
4.444 |
| MEDIUM DUTY TRUCKS (MDV) |
3.543 |
2.867 |
2.342 |
| LIGHT HEAVY DUTY GAS TRUCKS - 1 (LHDV1) |
0.783 |
0.713 |
0.777 |
| LIGHT HEAVY DUTY GAS TRUCKS - 2 (LHDV2) |
0.282 |
0.239 |
0.199 |
| MEDIUM HEAVY DUTY GAS TRUCKS (MHDV) |
1.972 |
1.301 |
0.855 |
| HEAVY HEAVY DUTY GAS TRUCKS (HHDV) |
1.375 |
0.892 |
0.553 |
| LIGHT HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRUCKS - 1 (LHDV1) |
0.086 |
0.063 |
0.049 |
| LIGHT HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRUCKS - 2 (LHDV2) |
0.058 |
0.043 |
0.032 |
| MEDIUM HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRUCKS (MHDV) |
0.286 |
0.227 |
0.183 |
| HEAVY HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRUCKS (HHDV) |
1.389 |
1.006 |
0.776 |
| MOTORCYCLES (MCY) |
1.211 |
1.012 |
0.969 |
| HEAVY DUTY DIESEL URBAN BUSES (UB) |
0.099 |
0.092 |
0.087 |
| HEAVY DUTY GAS URBAN BUSES (UB) |
0.310 |
0.296 |
0.267 |
| SCHOOL BUSES (SB) |
0.149 |
0.150 |
0.145 |
| MOTOR HOMES (MH) |
0.438 |
0.291 |
0.164 |